Knowledge and controlled action
Modernize one legacy workflow without a wholesale rewrite
A critical legacy application is hard to change, and the business cannot pause for a full rebuild.
Who this helps
CIO, CTO, COO, Application modernization leader
Discuss this workThe situation
A critical application is difficult to change. Documentation is incomplete, and the business cannot pause operations while a new system is built from scratch. Source code describes implementation, but business rules may live in scheduled jobs, database behavior and staff practice. AI-generated documentation and code can repeat those misunderstandings with confidence.
What we build
We modernize one capability at a time, with the old behavior captured as the standard to match.
- We map the selected workflow and its dependencies from authorized source code, a dependency inventory, sanitized transactions and known business rules.
- AI drafts explanations and candidate changes with source references, so engineers can check every claim.
- Existing behavior is captured in characterization tests. A bounded interface is introduced, and old and new behavior are compared on the same inputs. Only the accepted capability moves, through a controlled routing layer.
- Unexpected differences stop the migration. Traffic routes back to the legacy capability where supported, preserving transaction state. Data already changed may need separate reconciliation.
- Proprietary source and production data stay within approved tooling. Code-generation tool permissions are restricted, and the boundary includes developer tooling, source storage and logs.
What you get
- A workflow and dependency map. The selected workflow, its dependencies and the business-rule questions still open.
- Candidate implementation. AI-drafted changes with source references, characterization tests and review evidence.
- A migration plan. How the accepted capability moves, how parity is verified and how traffic routes back if needed.
Where people stay in control
- Domain experts confirm business rules.
- Engineers review generated code before an authorized release owner moves traffic.
- Material data or schema changes need explicit review beyond a passing test run.
When another approach fits
An ordinary integration, vendor upgrade or manual documentation may be enough. Avoid AI-driven rewriting where there is no reliable behavioral baseline or owner for the rules.
Related work
Scope it with us
Bring the workflow, the data you can share and the decision it supports. We agree how the work will be evaluated before anything is built.
Discuss the workSee all use cases